scrapbook


The case for courtroom presentations.

June 23rd, 2010 | Jeff Brenman

legal-right-brain2.jpg

Not everyone is happy about the use of presentations in the legal industry.

There are some who think presentations force lawyers to dumb down their content for the jury. I’d argue it’s not the tool that’s responsible, but rather the person using it. The power of any presentation is all in how it’s used, and great visual storytelling has the potential to give lawyers a significant competitive edge. You could even say their future depends on it.

Texas lawyer David Bissinger makes a compelling case for multimedia in the courtroom in this recent article from Law.com.

A compelling case exists that using multimedia increases juror competence. At least three reasons should prompt trial lawyers to use, and trial judges to embrace, multimedia devices. First, scientific and other high-level learning depends upon visualization; the best advocates, like the best teachers, teach by using visual aids. Second, multimedia argument advances the ancient art of advocacy through storytelling. Third, the forces of technological innovation will put lawyers who fail to embrace these methods out of business.

Check it out: Article Link

2 Responses to “The case for courtroom presentations.”

  1. Is multimedia evil?…

    Photo by Helico Jeff Brenman from Apollo Ideas writes about a debate around the use of multimedia presentations in the courtroom. He quotes Texas lawyer David Bissinger that in Brenman’s opinion makes “a compelling case for multimedia in the courtroom”…

  2. Ted Brooks says:

    My review of TrialPad and Evidence (two iPad Apps for trial presentation) has just been posted on AMLAW http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202477602410

Leave a Reply